{"id":21969,"date":"2024-11-24T07:50:52","date_gmt":"2024-11-24T07:50:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/margiewarrell.com\/?p=21969"},"modified":"2024-11-28T12:25:18","modified_gmt":"2024-11-28T12:25:18","slug":"disagreement-doesnt-have-to-divide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/margiewarrell.com\/disagreement-doesnt-have-to-divide\/","title":{"rendered":"Disagreement Doesn\u2019t Have To Divide: Navigating Family Tensions"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” da_disable_devices=”off|off|off” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” da_is_popup=”off” da_exit_intent=”off” da_has_close=”on” da_alt_close=”off” da_dark_close=”off” da_not_modal=”on” da_is_singular=”off” da_with_loader=”off” da_has_shadow=”on”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.2″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” custom_padding=”||0px|||”]<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s completely fine to not be around [Trump voters] and to tell them why,\u201d said Dr. Amanda Calhoun on MSNBC. She went further, saying it\u2019s \u201cessential\u201d to do so.<\/p>\n

Statements like this capture the heightened tensions of our time. They reflect the polarizing dynamics that have infiltrated not just public discourse but our most intimate spaces\u2014our families. While it\u2019s tempting to avoid difficult conversations with relatives whose political beliefs clash with ours, doing so may unintentionally deepen divides and limit opportunities for genuine connection.<\/p>\n

As Abraham Lincoln, who led America through its most divided period, once said, \u201cThe dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.\u201d These words hold as true for navigating familial tensions as they do for addressing national challenges.<\/p>\n

In today\u2019s divisive and polarized climate, I believe we must move beyond the instinct to shun or shame others for their views. Instead, we have an opportunity to foster understanding by engaging with curiosity and empathy\u2014even when it\u2019s uncomfortable.<\/p>\n

Division Is Not New<\/strong><\/p>\n

America has weathered deep divides before\u2014on slavery, women\u2019s suffrage, the Vietnam War, and more recently, gay marriage and healthcare reform. Each time, individuals had a choice: engage with those on the other side or retreat into echo chambers that reinforced their own perspectives.<\/p>\n

Retreating into ideological silos can feel safer, especially when media and social platforms amplify outrage and validate our sense of righteousness. Research from Harvard suggests that avoiding those with differing views only reinforces stereotypes and entrenches division. Similarly, studies show that social media algorithms prioritize divisive content because it keeps us engaged, even as it narrows our capacity for empathy.<\/p>\n

But our relationships\u2014especially with family\u2014are built on more than political alignment. They\u2019re rooted in shared memories, mutual care, and the respect for each other\u2019s humanity. Avoiding loved ones over political differences might provide short-term relief, but it undermines our capacity for meaningful connection and social cohesion.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s Practice Pluralism In Our Own Backyard<\/strong><\/p>\n

At a recent event celebrating the work of Hardwired Global<\/a> and a documentary<\/a> by The Good Road about the impact of their work promoting pluralism in conflict zones, a young Yazidi boy from Mosul shared this simple but profound truth:<\/p>\n

\u201cJust because people think differently doesn\u2019t make them an enemy.\u201d<\/p>\n

His words struck a chord. Cancel culture\u2014our own brand of modern tribalism\u2014often shames and isolates those whose opinions differ from ours. There has been no irony lost on me that some of the loudest voices in championing DEI have the the fastest to loudly shame and exclude those whose opinions have not conformed to their own. As Bren\u00e9 Brown\u2019s research reminds us, empathy is impossible when we sit in judgment.<\/p>\n

The same principle applies around our holiday tables. Shunning relatives who voted differently may feel justified, but it closes the door on conversations that could help bridge divides. Instead of aiming to \u201cwin\u201d arguments or prove your relative wrong, we can approach these moments as opportunities to deepen our understanding of why the people we love hod opinions we may loathe.<\/p>\n

Disagreement Doesn\u2019t Have to Divide<\/strong><\/p>\n

Engaging with family members who see the world differently doesn\u2019t mean abandoning your own values. It means choosing to prioritize connection over being right. So how do you do that?<\/p>\n

Start by redefining success. Instead of focusing on changing someone\u2019s mind, make it your goal as you spend time with relatives this holiday season to better understand not just what they think, but the experiences that formed their opinion. This shift in mindset reduces defensiveness and opens the door to meaningful dialogue.<\/p>\n

Here are a few open-ended questions to spark conversation:<\/p>\n